Skip to content

February 3, 2011

4

JPA letter obfuscates arena transparency problems

by Deena Winter


After several days of bad publicity, the city’s arena JPA finally responded to the criticism with a letter to the Journal Star yesterday. Although given that the three JPA members aren’t legally allowed to meet privately — because it’s a violation of their bylaws — I’m not sure how they got together to write the letter.

Perhaps someone wrote it for them?

But anyway.

Let’s get into the meat of the issue: As I’ve written before, the arena JPA has taken a troubling turn lately, allowing its general contractor, Mortenson Construction of Minnesota, to skip using the city’s purchasing process to choose most of its subcontractors. Mortenson has argued that it needs to have this flexibility to get the project done on time and under budget.

Problem is, they’re not doing it the way the city specified when it solicited bids from companies nationwide.

Trivial, I know. Unless you’re one of the other bidders.

Now the JPA (that’s Mayor Chris Beutler, Councilwoman Jayne Snyder and Nebraska Regent Tim Clare) is defending its decision to go ahead and approve the pre-construction contract, despite its less-than-transparent features. They argued in their letter that the city’s electronic bidding process (e-bid) wouldn’t allow Mortenson to steer contracts to Lincoln businesses, because they would have to take the lowest bid.

Not so: It’s not the e-bid computer system that prohibits them from playing favorites for local companies — it’s the city charter. However, the city doesn’t have to take the low bid if the company doesn’t meet specifications — and those specifications can include all the “important factors” (like their safety record or experience) the JPA said Mortenson needed to be able to evaluate in choosing subcontractors.

They also said e-bid wouldn’t allow Mortenson to force subs to “sharpen their pencils” to find additional savings after bids are submitted — but that also opens the door to wheeling and dealing with their preferred sub to make sure they get the job.
The JPA did acknowledge the validity of “the concern about transparency” — but claimed the amendments they adopted would bring some transparency to the process. However, seeing scorecards and names of bidders does not eliminate the fact that the public STILL WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE THE ACTUAL BIDS.

This kind of secrecy and shrouding got Mortenson in trouble in Kentucky, and it may just get them crossways with contractors here, too, if the JPA continues to allow Mortenson to run roughshod.

Advertisements
4 Comments Post a comment
  1. John Duhon
    Feb 3 2011

    Well it looks like you’ve completely ignored the story that Lincoln has the lowest unemployment rate in the entire nation. THE ENTIRE NATION. I guess that doesn’t fit well into your narrative that Beutler and the City Council are crooked and incompotent and contrasts with your worldview.

    Reply
  2. I'm Watching
    Feb 3 2011

    Deena – once again, you’ve hit the nail on the head. Because the actul bids will NOT be available to the public, the JPA has made a mockery of the public’s desire (and all of the prior promises) for complete transparency. I smell a rat.

    Reply
  3. Joe's Bro
    Feb 3 2011

    The report is that Lincoln has the lowest unemployment rate in the nation. I have also heard that Nebraska economy has come through the depression pretty much unscathed.
    If only the facts as presented portrayed the truth. If everything is so rosy in Lincoln, Nebraska, and everyone that wants a good paying job is working, If the results of the study or survey are facts then why is the state $1 billion in the hole? Where are the tax revenues that would support the results of the study?
    The lowest unemployment rate in the nation means nothing if everyone is working for minimum wage, or for some other reason the results are skewed in some way.
    There is little reason to celebrate when Lincoln has the lowest unemployment rate in the nation and the mayor is threatening a doubling of the property tax mill levy because the state is $1 billion in the red.
    Lincoln unemployment rate is a great victory for the talking heads of Lincoln. I do not think I could take many more of these Pyrrhic victories.

    Reply
  4. Roberta
    Feb 4 2011

    All the more the buddy system will work and thier excuss will be no enough people in Lincoln looking for work.

    Reply

Your take

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments