Skip to content

April 12, 2011


Platte Institute: CIR bill “neither significant nor meaningful” reform

by Deena Winter

The Platte Institute for Economic Research today called Sen. Steve Lathrop’s CIR bill “neither significant nor meaningful reform of the Commission on Industrial Relations.”

The Platte Institute is a nonpartisan think tank that promotes free enterprise and limited government.

“The legislation under consideration does not remedy an untenable situation but actually makes it worse,” said Platte Institute Executive Director John McCollister. “The bill subjects private business to intrusive subpoenas, rewards failing teachers and doesn’t help governments control and reduce employee costs.”

“Unfortunately the call for significant and meaningful reform has gone unheeded, primarily because it further perpetuates a public policy that fails the taxpayer,” said McCollister.

The Platte Institute called the CIR an “antiquated relic” and said Lathrop’s bill gives it greater authority and no additional transparency. The group said the bill creations confusion by making a complex process even more complex and creates the potential for disparate impacts based solely on the type of employer. For instance, only school districts are permitted to present evidence of an inability to pay –- not cities and counties.

Among their other points:

LB 397 Subjects Private Business to Intrusive Subpoenas
Because the CIR retains its subpoena power, LB 397 could force private businesses to disclose documents relating to wages, health benefits, pensions and retirement in an attempt to compare public to private employers. For example, because Omaha has few in-state public employers for its comparison array of clerical employees, the CIR may compare Omaha with Mutual of Omaha or First National Bank and would have subpoena authority over all relevant employee records.

LB 397 Opens the Door to Mandatory Collective Bargaining
LB 397 could make any staffing issue a mandatory subject of collective bargaining. The recent Omaha Fire case made a distinction between purely managerial staffing issues and staffing issues related to “safety”.

LB 397 Rewards Failing Teachers
LB 397 further undermines the authority of school districts to assign teachers to underserved or “academically underachieving” schools by requiring districts to negotiate incentive pay for new and existing teachers. This could provide up to a 20 percent raise to the teachers who created the circumstances for the “underachieving” designation in the first place.

LB 397 Does Not Cut Spending
LB 397 allows the CIR to create an hourly rate value based on insurance premiums and pension values to adjust wage rates. Only wages for new employees or demoted employees may be diminished, wages for existing employees can only be frozen until they are below comparability – i.e. they can never be diminished.

8 Comments Post a comment
  1. Frank Edler
    Apr 12 2011

    How can you call the Platte Institute for Economic Research a nonpartisan thinktank when they say that they promote free enterprise and small government? To promote those two goals is to believe in market fundamentalism. That sounds pretty darn partison to me.

  2. Roberta
    Apr 12 2011

    Does this really surprise anyone, look whose trying to fix the problem they created.
    Just hang that air freshner on your car mirror.

    Those who are trying to fix the problem only compare government employees with small businesses, let’s get real, it can not be fixed in one session of the legislators, too many outside forces with closed minds working on this.

  3. truth
    Apr 12 2011

    Great work Deena thanks for the info.

  4. Matthew Platte
    Apr 12 2011

    They can, and do, call themselves non-partisan because they don’t directly and publicly endorse candidates. By ballyhooing the term non-partisan they want you to think that they are *non-political*; that they are not choosing sides. That they are simply advocating for the good of all people in Nebraska.

  5. Tim C.
    Apr 12 2011

    Did you all see that Jeff Eells endorsed Hove over his fellow Democrat Anna Wishart? It doesn’t surprise me. I went to SE High School with him, he was a snake 20 years and he still is one.

    • ej
      Apr 14 2011

      So not towing the party line makes you a snake? What does Anna Wishart bring to the table, other than the fact that she’s spent a lot of time in airports?

  6. Scott Wendt
    Apr 13 2011

    Deena, shouldn’t “nonpartisan” be in quotation marks when writing about the Platte Institute. If I’m looking for a nonpartisan view I certainly don’t expect Pete Ricketts to offer one. Maybe “think tank” should be in quotation marks also, how about “right wing propaganda mill”?

  7. Jane H Kinsey
    Apr 13 2011

    I was at the hearing today and Mayor Beutler testified FOR it! This is how he helps taxpayers. How can people vote for him?


Your take

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: